FOOTNOTE: The judgement as previously mentioned in this particular case has been regrettably removed from this site.

The reason.? Early on Wednesday 19th July 2006 at approximately 8.45am HUKO had a visit from local detectives in Perth formally advising and requesting the judgement be removed, this direction came assumibly from the Magistrate presiding on this case.

Whilst HUKO maintains the children at the centre of this case have NOT been indentified by us as we had edited out all names of the parties involved, we have complied with requests to remove it from our site. Whereas the mother in this case has openly and freely named the children at the centre of this case not concerned over the privacy of the children, but yet it seems in Switzerland you can name the children, and the mother and the father, and the father's location.

Under Section 121 of the Family Law Act, no media or person can name the parties at the centre of Family Law hearings, otherwise prosecution can take place against the media outlet or individuals.

I was cautioned and notified in a statement from the detectives that a willing statement i gave will be tendered to the DPP (Dept Public Prosecution) for review whether as founder of Hug-Ur-Kids Organisation (HUKO) whether or not i shall be charged and prosecuted.

I would like to add the detectives were very polite and professional, and this was a formal request.

When an update is available and not in breach of any Australian Laws i shall post it on the site, once again we apologise that if you were intending to view this judgement it is now UNAVAILABLE at this time.

Thank you......................Geoff Day - Founder of HUKO

Swiss mother abducts her 2 Perth born children using false passports to leave Australia, alienates them against the father for nearly 4 years, fights the courts only to have the children bought back to Australia where the father has his parental rights literally taken away from him by Big Brother (DCD - Dept Children's Development) in an unprecendented move by DCD whereas no evidence against the father of being an abusive parent but yet DCD and Perth Family Court work in tandem to deny the father his rightful parental rights, along with other professionals that are pro mother.

See and read the full judgement, see how being a child abductor you can supercede laws in 2 countries and still get the 2 small kids back....and they say our laws are befitting the 21st century.

To protect the kids in this case their names have been removed and replaced with SON & DAUGHTER.

Now is your chance to decide is the mother giving the father a fair go.? or out to ruin his name and reputation and ruin his relationship with his children and in the process screw these poor kids minds up.

JUDGEMENT REMOVED THIS LINK IS INVALID

Comments (9)

Show/Hide comments Be Sure!!! written by Allison on August 19, 2006 This case is familiar to me as back in 2000 or 2001 (can't quite remember now) I witnessed a custody handover of these children in a public carpark in Carlisle & believe me I have never forgotten it, that little girl screamed the whole suburb down as she fought whilst being put into her father's car. Later that day I saw the mother and she had the children back with her and she brought M over and the little girl asked me to help her. Now I am not saying that the mother hasn't put things into the child's head, however apparently the father's side accused me of already knowing this woman and making it all up (never met her before in mylife). The mother did seem a bit over the top in what she disclosed to me, but I thought maybe is just her culture or pure desperation for her children? Whatever the truth is, we will probably never really know for sure and all I can say is I hope the true parent who really loves and cares for these children will have justice prevail and pray that the children can recover from such a insecure and troubled childhood.!!! No restrictions on the courts written by Graham Woolley on August 10, 2006 This case vividly exposes the license given those with a law degree. They can, and do, make up the rules as they go. There must be a judicial commission set up, with lay people on board, to keep the courts honest. One expects the same set of rules to be applied to all parties in all cases. I have not read the case, as it has been removed, but can only suspect that it exhibits bias to one party. It is intolerable that a result in court depends on whether you wear pants or a skirt. With no oversight over courts (or lawyers) the system, overseen by themselves in secret onclave, can do as it wishes. Graham Whats the judge afraid of!!!!! written by Grant on July 24, 2006 So what now the judge is putting the heavies on HUKO, why is she afraid that we have read her judgement and are disgusted that a Mother who has totally emotionally abused her children and alienated them from their Father and Family are going to now be given free slather to continue doing so at the judges request. If these children are sent back to the Mother that has only one agenda then I hope the Judge will hold herself personally responsible for the outcome that is to follow, talk about a bias feminist system. The Father was NEVER given a chance with DCD determined to destroy any relationship that was trying to develop, I bet if he did not have the DCD involved in his children's and his lives he would actually have a relationship that was far more loving and stable than what they are to be returned to with the Mother, which as I read it is a twisted Mother who has no family support ( No wonder ) compared to a loving Father who has obviously been to hell and back in order to try have his children in his life along with a partner and her child and supportive family members. The allegations the Mother has made have obviously been for one purpose only and that is to cut the Father from their lives. LETS FACE IT IF THE FATHER WAS GUILTY OF THE ALLEGATIONS, HE WOULD HAVE SIMPLY WALKED AWAY, WHAT MAN WOULD PUT HIMSELF THROUGH COURTS FOR 6 YEARS UNLESS HE WAS A LOVING FATHER, AND DETERMINED TO BE IN HIS CHILDREN'S LIVES AND TO PROVE THAT HIS KIDS NEED A FATHER!! How the heck did this judge come to believe the kids are better off being emotionally abused, and how the heck can any australian r\orders stand up in another country, it seems the judge has made a very unprofessional judgement, and you have to wonder why!!! IF THE JUDGE WAS SCARED OF THE PUBLIC SEEING THE JUDGEMENT WHAT HAS SHE GOT TO HIDE. YOU HAVE TO QUESTION WAS THE JUDGE INFLUENCED BY A HIGHER AUTHORITY OR BY SOMETHING ELSE, I GUESS IT WOULDN'T BE THE FIRST TIME THAT SOMETHING UNTOWARD IS TO GO ON IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM. AFTERALL THE MOTHER HAS COMMITED PASSPORT FRAUD WHAT ELSE HAS SHE BEEN UP TO.................... IT CERTAINLY MAKES YOU WONDER What a lot of crock. My message to the Father and his partner is don't give up now!! Your children need you! What a crock! written by Grant on July 18, 2006 I have read the whole judgement and it appears that you simply kidnap or abduct your kids and move to a neutral country and refuse to come back. You set up a status quo in hiding where the father can't possibly see the children and indoctrinate the children against the father. If a male does it it is seen as aggressive, controlling, abduction / kidnapping, brainwashing and/or emotionally abusive. If the woman does it it is 'over concern', over protectiveness or just over anxious mothering etc. What a crock! The Mother seems to have won by denying the father the chance for a normal relationship with the kids whilst comitting a federal crime and going into hiding and then gets rewarded for it. Why has she not had to be held accountable for her actions by the courts or police, how weak is this country that passport fraud is acceptable...............or is it acceptable because it is a mother commiting the crime, it would be very interesting how this situation would have panned out if a Father had done all that this Mother has done. No doubt a Male would be in jail! I hope the Father will fight back, I would if it were me. It is clear from the summation what the Mother would do to the kids emotionally if they went back to her and I would like to know how all the things the judge has asked to happen in switzerland can be proved? The Mother obviously knows people there and who knows whether she will actually seek the help or whether she will just get letters saying that she has and will fulfil all requirements. CD has done absolutely nothing for the Father. It is clear that they had it in for him. Even the judge says that ! Good luck with your appeal and fight for justice not that there seems to have been much so far! What! Let the Mother have another go in totally damaging these poor kids!!!!! written by Tracey on July 18, 2006 You have got to be kidding, this woman shows no respect to the law or to her children by putting them through such an ordeal and the judge says give them back to her! In reading the judgement it is quite clear that the Mother never accepted the judges previous judgment that the Father had not indecently dealt with his daughter so what makes the judge think she will accept and abide by the latest decision. I bet these kids will end up with further major psychological damage and who is to blame the Judge firstly for sending them back, closely follwed by DCD and of course the Mother. The Father has obviously not been given a chance when in six years it seems he has only in the last weeks had normal contact with his children. Lets face it as woman we have a lot of power and this shows of a woman who is hell bent on destroying any relationship between the children and Father and now can contue to do so with the blessing of the courts and DCD. I hope the Judge and DCD can sleep at night!! I wish the Father is all the best with his appeal. Sham, Shame Judge Penny written by Eleanor on July 17, 2006 Could you not see through the smoke screen presented by the mother and DCD? What a theatrical farce ... and the so called expert witnesses somewhat lacking in common sense to say the least! If only they could take a step in the Fathers shoes. Hold your head high Mr Wood and for god sake APPEAL. You, your partner, and your children are the victims - this is a great injustice. what are they seriously thinking? written by jonathon on July 12, 2006 i'm noy quite fully understanding the logic of sending these two children back to a woman who clearly has no regard for the rules of land and seems like a cunning type. i am disgusted she used such a pathetic accusation as sexual abuse to get her way. i hope the father gets to keep his children, to give them a stable, healthy upbringing; and to keep them from exposure to a seemingly out of touch mother. good luck to the father! Mr written by Paul Hurford on July 11, 2006 Firstly I am discusted with the judgement handed down by Judge Penny, and the way DCD have acting against the father, I myself and my brother were in Foster care around the same age as the 2 children in question and the way DCD used to ask us questions where much to be desired. I think DCD needs to talk to the children and explain exactly what will happen if they go back to Switzerland that it's they are not going back for a holiday it is for good. I mean what type of law system do we have here where a women can ellegally abduct 2 children with fake passports and smuggle them into Switzerland and get away with it, and secondly what type of life are the children going to have in Switzerland where the children are going to have to learn the language when they are perfectly happy in Australia and looks like settling down for the first time in their lives. I feel so sorry for the father and what this women has put him and his family through and just hope that justice will be done. And they want to send this kids back.? written by Evelyn on July 9, 2006 You've got to be kidding me, are the courts here in touch with reality, i know the above is just some of the judgement, boy oh boy who would want to send kids off to a mother like this.? Is our system wanting to punish the kids yet again by sending them back to what can only be best described as a 'loony' mother.? As a woman and mother of 3 i am ashamed of many women out there using the sexual abuse claim as a last resort to hang on to their children. Shame on you women who do that. I hope the father is successful in keeping the children here, he sure deserves some decent break.

Write comment

Name:

Email:

Title:

Comment:

Write the displayed characters Add Comment